Guns Versus Books
The international community has not been able to put an
end to Syria’s conflict till now. One of the major reasons is the sheer lack of
political will. There are several provisions present within the legal remit of
the UN which can be invoked to prevent the humanitarian crises. But an archaic
veto system, used to its full advantage by Russia and China, two of the five UNSC permanent members, has
blocked the much needed relief.
Russia and China subscribe to Article 2(7) of
the UN Charter in defense of their veto use. [The article states that the UN is
not authorized to intervene in domestic jurisdiction of any state].But that is
just one provision, misinterpreted, to suit vested interests.
Responsibility
to Protect’ (R2P), adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2005 is a powerful
provision that can be invoked in full spirit to safeguard civilians. The
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, (ICISS), which
enshrines R2P was built to minimize the “capricious” use of veto. Besides, R2P
stipulates that if a state fails to protect its citizens, it becomes an
international responsibility that humanitarian crises be addressed.
There
is no dearth of legal solution to end Syrian crises. There is chapter VII with Articles
43-47, allowing UNSC to take enforcement action when threat to peace exists or an
act of aggression takes place. Others like Article 24 and 1.1 emphasize on
peace and security.
But
deficit in political will has caused the war to continue. The youth is engaged with
weapons rather than books. The institution of war is gaining prominence over
institutions of education and literally writing obituaries of their own people.
May be it’s time to turn to books for a real revolution!
(photo courtesy:ibtimes.co.uk)
(photo courtesy:ibtimes.co.uk)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home